|
<
Previous Page
The Next Frontier of Innovation

CB. If we can model a building we can improve it.
If we can really simulate what it's going to look like when
we walk through it, what the sounds are going to be like when
you are sitting in an auditorium, what the implications of
the materials and the cost are...I think that is really the
next phase of innovations.
Most CAD to this point has not really been about design,
regardless of what many people say; it has really been about
producing working drawings. And I think we (Graphisoft) have
that handled really well. The next frontier is really to make
the computer a real design companion for architects.
AFR. Along those same lines, some of your competitors
like Autodesk are coming up with 'electronic sketching tools'
and tools like SketchUpthese more naturalistic computer
tools which are supposed to simulate the architect's more
traditional drawing methods. What is Graphisoft doing to address
that front?
CB. Well I think you will see some things later on
in the year that will address that specifically...not just
turning a sketch into a model but in the modeling environment
which will give you more tools to do those types of things.
I think there is a danger when you take the computer and
try to turn it into a sketch pad. I think that part of the
challenge, taking the type of environment where the architect
is familiar with and trying to imagine where that environment
can be with computer technology, is where Graphisoft wants
to be.
It is more than just sketching. But you know, I love SketchUp,
I think it is a great product. The nice thing is if you can
take that more sketchy model and bring it into a more architectural
modeling program like ArchiCAD. There is a benefit there.
AFR. Speaking of sketching and the like, a lot of
architects now are walking around with Palm Pilots and other
PDA or smart devices and so forth....and there seems to be
a push to get CAD data on these small devices. Will Graphisoft
be addressing that front?
CB. You know I actually don't know if we have anything
yet planned for a handheld computer. I think a lot of that
is being taken care of by the hardware itself. Today what
I can do on a laptop would have weighed about eighty pounds
ten years ago.
AFR. So your users are not asking for that kind of
a product? The PDA CAD solution?
CB. No. Not yet. There are certain areas with the
facilities management where that functionality is needed,
but for the designer they want to sit down and have both hands
free.
Market Focus - Market Forces

AFR. Sure. Let's talk a little bit about your userbase.
I know you guys are grabbing a lot more users. For example,
in a Boston area an architects' survey ArchiCAD had about
fifteen percent (15%) of the market, whereas Autocad was down
to just 49 percent (49%). Is Graphisoft targeting Autocad
users directly...going directly after Autodesk?
CB. Absolutely. For a number of reasons. One, Autocad
has gotten as good as it's going to get in terms of drafting.
There just aren't too many more ways to draw an arc.
AFR. Makes sense. I completely agree with you there.
CB. And, quite frankly, they have in the US, a dominant
marketshare. So most users are going to be coming over from
Autocad. We like to say 80 percent of ArchiCAD users are ex-Autocad
users.
AFR. Is that true?
CB. (laughter...) Yea! when you stop to think about
it it is not at all that surprising. Quite frankly, while
Architectural Desktop has made a lot of strides, it is still
something that was built on top of something that was meant
to be a 2D drafting program. It doesn't have the type of system
architecture you need to have to do real 3D, architectural
[intelligent] modeling.
And so we would like to be in a situation where we are competing
head-to-head with Architectural Desktop because it would become
very clear to someone who is comparing them side-by-side that
one is just much less cumbersome, much more designed for its
purpose.
The other side to this is that throughout the 90's people
were very busy and didn't have the time to learn, or just
stop and evaluate a new CAD program...but things are changing
a bit now. There isn't that backlog of work maybe...and they
realize now is the time to sit down and do an evaluation.
They know 3D is coming and they now have the time to be interested.
AFR. That makes a lot of sense. I talk to many folks
regularly and it is true, they get too busy and they literally
do not have the time to learn a new system and that is definitely
a challenge for utilizing new software during a boom period.
AFR. In terms of an approach to persuading an Autocad
user, what is your angle?
CB. I think there are two things. One we talk about
the productivity. There is a quote from one of our customers-Orcutt
Winslow Partnership, who have about 65 Macintoshes using ArchiCAD
in Phoenix-and they said, "by the time I'm done with design
development my construction documents are about 60 percent
complete". And that really gets to the real advantage of model-based
design inherent in ArchiCAD. The construction documents are
almost bi-products [of the model]. So there is tremendous
productivity there.
And then the other things is that when you have a lot of
people drafting with Autocad, you usually have a lot of designers
designing and then you have the production crew drafting on
Autocad. With ArchiCAD it's is a different situation. The
people doing the designing are working with the product. You
know, the thing I like about ArchiCAD is it just puts the
fun back into design.
Designers can design up to the last minute, they can revise
the design in the model and not just think of it as a marketing
tool. So the two things we really push in our marketing to
Autocad users is the enhanced productivity and the fun.
AFR. I want to talk a little about your users. Do
you know if many of your ArchiCAD users on the Mac are migrating
to Windows or vice versa perhaps?
| 1
| 2 | 3 | 4
|

|